Brooks D. Cash, MD, FACP
Introduction
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other gastric acid-mediated disease are the most common clinical problems seen in a typical gastroenterology practice. By extension, these conditions are also commonly encountered in the primary care arena. The prevalence of GERD in the population is estimated to be between 15% and 20%. It is widely accepted that GERD and other acid-mediated conditions, such as peptic ulcer disease, are important sources of morbidity and even mortality in a subset of patients and, if unrecognized or ineffectively treated, are associated with significant impairments in quality of life.[1] Acid-suppression therapy is the basis for effective treatment of these disorders. In 2005, clinicians have an impressive array of acid-suppressing medications from which to choose. Since their introduction in the early 1990s, the proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become the agents of choice for the treatment of acid-mediated disorders for many practicing clinicians and knowledgeable patients, and have become one of the most frequently prescribed classes of medications worldwide.
During this year's meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), multiple studies directed at therapeutic approaches for GERD and other acid-mediated conditions were presented. This report discusses many of these topical issues.
Erosive Esophagitis and Barrett's Esophagus
The classic symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation make GERD relatively simple to recognize and treat in the majority of cases. Because of its prevalence, however, complications arising from GERD, such as erosive esophagitis (EE), bleeding, peptic stricture, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and esophageal adenocarcinoma underscore the importance of aggressive acid suppression in the subset of patients prone to complicated disease. Therapy for EE may be conceptualized as 2-pronged, much like that of inflammatory bowel disease. The primary objective is to provide symptom relief and mucosal healing. The second objective is to maintain this healing and thus prevent the development of additional complications. Previous studies have demonstrated the superiority of PPIs over placebo and histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for both of these treatment goals. During this year's ACG meeting, Comer and colleagues[2] added to that body of evidence with their report on the effects of pantoprazole 40 mg daily vs ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for the maintenance of symptom relief in patients with a history of EE. In this analysis, the degree of both daytime and nighttime symptom control in 175 patients treated with pantoprazole was found to be superior to that in 176 patients treated with ranitidine. This finding is especially important in light of published data linking nighttime GERD symptoms to a greater probability of complicated disease.[3] In this pooled analysis, approximately 90% of patients treated with the PPI were free from daytime and nighttime GERD symptoms more than 70% of the time, and 75% were free from symptoms more than 90% of the time. Corresponding values for ranitidine were approximately 62% and 36%, respectively.
Several investigators also offered data on BE that deserve additional evaluation. In one of these reports, 61 patients with BE managed on long-term PPI therapy were followed longitudinally for periods of up to 16 years for a total of 853 patient-years of follow-up.[4] Most of these patients were on omeprazole or esomeprazole either daily or twice daily. All patients underwent surveillance upper endoscopies in accordance with societal guidelines during the study period. Only 5 patients developed a worsening of their GERD-related disease. One patient developed low-grade esophageal dysplasia which could not be found on subsequent sampling, and 4 patients experienced recurrent Los Angeles class B or C EE, which responded to more aggressive PPI dosing. No patients developed adenocarcinoma of the esophagus during follow-up. However, there were several instances of gastric fundic gland polyposis, and 1 patient developed a gastric adenoma with high-grade dysplasia that was resected completely. This study is too small to establish a causal relationship with PPIs and these gastric lesions, but additional reports such as this one would be helpful in that regard. These concerns notwithstanding, however, PPI therapy in patients with BE appears to be very well tolerated and may be an important aspect of care in the prevention of more worrisome disease in such patients. Two other related abstracts also merit discussion because they suggest that chronic PPI therapy in GERD patients may be protective in terms of risk reduction for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The first of these reports was a case series examining the effects of lifestyle revisions (weight loss, abstinence from caffeine, etc) and high doses of PPIs (160-360 mg daily), and documents regression of BE in 5 patients so treated.[5] The second of these reports is a retrospective review of the Veterans' Affairs Database for the period 1998-2004.[6] Of the 80,784 patients with an ICD-9 code of GERD, 55,875 (69.2%) were prescribed PPI therapy. Esophageal cancer (cell type not specified) was diagnosed in 223 (0.3%). In their multivariate analysis to determine which confounders might be associated with GERD and esophageal carcinoma, these investigators identified a protective effect linked to PPI use. Patients prescribed PPIs were nearly 50% less likely to develop esophageal cancer than those not prescribed PPI therapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.70; P < .0001). Obviously, these reports are limited with respect to the population studied (overwhelmingly male and white) and the lack of data regarding other diagnoses, such as BE as well as PPI dose and duration, but they are hypothesis-generating and may be signals that aggressive acid suppression in patients with GERD may have additional benefits above and beyond just symptom control.
Endoscopy-Negative Reflux Disease
The PPIs, given their demonstrated efficacy and safety, are now considered to be the prescription agents of choice for patients with chronic uncomplicated and complicated GERD. PPIs have repeatedly been shown to be superior to other acid-suppressing agents for both healing and symptom relief in patients with EE. Patients with EE, however, represent the minority of individuals with GERD symptoms. The larger population of patients -- those with typical GERD symptoms and the absence of endoscopic changes of the esophagus -- have what has been termed nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) or endoscopy-negative reflux disease (ENRD). Highly effective therapies for patients with ENRD remain elusive. PPIs significantly reduce symptoms in only 50% to 60% of such patients. Historically these patients are treated with increasing doses of PPIs and may go on to other therapies, such as smooth-muscle relaxants, promotility agents, tricyclic antidepressants, or perhaps surgical/endoscopic treatments. One of the reasons for the diminished response to acid suppression is that there may be other factors besides acid that are responsible for the symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation in patients with ENRD. ENRD may actually be a heterogeneous condition comprising patients with acid reflux, nonacid reflux, and functional gastrointestinal syndromes. New technologies, such as the implantable wireless pH probe and esophageal impedance, have allowed clinicians to get a more complete picture of what is happening inside the esophagus. In particular, much of the data being derived from impedance, which allows clinicians to "see" a fluid reflux episode manifested by increased electrical conduction (decreased "impedance") along a series of spaced electrodes in the catheter, has led to the hypothesis of a "hypersensitive" esophagus in which the volume of the refluxed fluid bolus is thought to be as important as the pH of the fluid as a cause of symptoms. At this year's ACG meeting, Mittal and colleagues[7] relied on the older technologies of the Bernstein acid perfusion test and 24-hour pH monitoring to underscore the observation that not all GERD patients are the same. These investigators selected 28 patients with "classic" symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation and studied them with acid perfusion (Bernstein testing) and 24-hour pH testing. Only 46% (13/28) had a positive Bernstein test. Of the 75% of GERD patients reporting symptoms during pH monitoring, 8 were in the Bernstein-positive group whereas 13 were among those patients who had negative Bernstein tests. It is interesting that both groups of patients reporting symptoms during pH monitoring had similar symptom severity scores.
In another report, investigators studied 98 patients with the chronic GERD symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation who failed to respond to therapeutic doses of PPI administered for at least 8 weeks.[8] Approximately 75% used daily PPIs whereas 25% of patients used a twice-daily dose. In addition to heartburn and regurgitation, these patients also complained of belching (79%), dyspepsia (58%-72%), bloating (66%), excessive postprandial fullness (65%), chest pain (62%), hoarseness (47%), cough (45%), and nausea (43%). In descending order, heartburn, belching and upper abdominal discomfort, bloating, and chest pain were the most bothersome symptoms to these PPI nonresponders. In a related report,[9] investigators conducted a 4-week randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial of tegaserod,* a partial serotonin type-4 receptor agonist currently approved for use in patients with chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Forty-one patients were randomized to treatment with PPI plus tegaserod (6 mg twice daily) or PPI alone in a 2:1 allocation, and changes were measured both within treatment groups and between treatment groups. At the end of the trial there was significant symptom improvement noted in the PPI-plus-tegaserod group compared with in the PPI-alone group. Not only were the symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation reduced, but improvements were also noted in bloating and nausea (P < .05 for all comparisons) and a global symptom index score (P < .0002). No serious adverse events were reported. Although these data are very preliminary, this may represent an attractive approach in the management of this challenging group of patients.
Acid Suppression in Special Circumstances
Acid suppression is being increasingly used in special clinical circumstances, and data supporting these applications continue to accumulate. One of these circumstances is in patients with sleep disturbances, largely due to increasing awareness and recognition of the effects of GERD on sleep. However, it is becoming clear that typical GERD symptoms may not always declare themselves in patients with disturbed sleep. In one study presented during these meeting proceedings,[10] 81 patients with chronic sleep complaints underwent 2 separate polysomnographic sleep evaluations accompanied by distal pH monitoring. None of these patients had complaints of heartburn or regurgitation. As a result of physiologic testing, 26% of these patients were diagnosed with acid reflux, defined in this study as an intraesophageal pH < 4 for more than 30 seconds. Moreover, 25% of those with acid reflux had at least 1 episode that lasted more than 5 minutes. In fact, the average duration of each reflux episode was more than 30 minutes, and perhaps most important, 94% of all recorded reflux events were associated with an arousal or an awakening, suggesting a causal relationship. O'Connor and colleagues[11] found similar prevalence values in their examination of the quality of life (QOL) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and GERD. Among 168 patients with obstructive sleep apnea, 24% reported moderate-to-severe daytime GERD symptoms and 31% reported moderate-to-severe nighttime symptoms. Not surprisingly, obstructive sleep apnea patients had lower QOL scores than the general US population, and the addition of GERD symptoms resulted in even lower QOL scores. The effects of acid suppression on sleep in this group of patients remains to be seen, but studies such as these continue to add to the body of evidence supporting a role for GERD in disordered sleep, and it may become advisable to evaluate such patients with objective techniques such as pH monitoring because typical GERD symptoms may not always be present.
The only PPI with a US Food and Drug Administration approval for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is pantoprazole. However, it appears that esomeprazole* is also effective at controlling acid output in patients with ZES, as demonstrated by Pisegna and colleagues.[12] In their report, 19 patients with ZES and 2 with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion were switched from their previous PPI and placed on varying doses of esomeprazole titrated to suppressed basal acid output and symptom control, measured after the switch and then again at 3 and 6 months. At 6 months, 95% of patients had controlled acid output, with the majority of these taking esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Adverse events were rare and manageable without PPI cessation.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well recognized as a leading cause of peptic ulcer disease, and gastrointestinal complications from NSAIDs are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Multiple approaches have been developed to minimize these risks, including the substitution of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective NSAIDs or the coadministration of misoprostol or acid-suppressing agents such as PPIs. Misoprostol is associated with crampy abdominal pain and diarrhea, and there are multiple unanswered questions regarding the safety of the COX-2 NSAIDs. PN 100* is a novel combination tablet that contains 15 mg of lansoprazole and 500 mg of enteric-coated naproxen. When administered twice daily to patients for 14 days, PN 100 was associated with significantly less incidence of gastric erosions or ulcers than either enteric-coated naproxen (500 mg twice daily) alone or enteric-coated naproxen plus lansoprazole (500 mg twice daily and 15 mg every morning, respectively).[13] There were no peptic ulcer complications reported. This study did not report on clinical symptoms such as dyspepsia and is limited by its small size, its endoscopic rather than clinical outcomes, and the unequal doses of PPI in the comparison groups -- but it does support future investigations with this combination medication and possibly others.
Endoscopic Approaches to GERD
Emerging data on plication, an endoscopic therapy for GERD, were presented during this year's ACG meeting. In the first of 2 studies, investigators reported follow-up data on patients who underwent plication with the EndoCinch (Bard; Billerica, Massachusetts) device between 1998 and 1999.[14] Prior to plication, all patients had mild GERD symptoms that required, and were responsive to, daily PPI therapy. Compared with 6 months post procedure at which point 69% of patients were off all PPI therapy, only 17% remained free of PPIs at 6 years. One patient from the original cohort of 13 had proceeded to fundoplication. Whereas larger studies are needed, this report highlights the importance of prolonged follow-up after these procedures. Prolonged treatment effects with another plication device, the Plicator(NDO Surgical; Mansfield, Massachusetts), were also reported during these meeting proceedings.[15] At 3 years post procedure, 60% of patients who were previously dependent on daily PPIs no longer required this therapy for their GERD symptoms. The fact that in the previous 24 months 20% of patients had noted an increasing need for GERD medications, however, is concerning in light of the previously mentioned 6-year data with the other plication device. It may be that these approaches, while still being refined, have a finite lifespan in terms of symptom relief. These data, in patients whose symptoms were previously completely controlled with medications, should make clinicians and patients seriously consider whether to pursue plication therapy at this time.
Concluding Remarks
We continue to gain important insights regarding the optimization of existing therapies and the development of new approaches to both uncomplicated and complicated GERD as well as other acid-mediated conditions. On the basis of data presented during this year's ACG meeting, the clinical evidence supporting the primary role of PPIs in patients with GERD symptoms or EE secondary to GERD appears to be incontrovertible. Although very preliminary, there is some evidence that aggressive acid suppression with PPI therapy may alter the natural course of preneoplastic conditions such as BE, but these data should be considered cautiously, with a view toward much larger and longer prospective studies. Clinical features that are unique to ENRD, and the reasons for nonresponsiveness to typical GERD therapy in this setting, are slowly being worked out. New approaches using non-acid-suppressing medications such as tegaserod in these patients are being reported and may hold some promise if future studies bear out these preliminary results. PPIs have also been shown to have a role in other acid-mediated conditions, such as ZES and peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis. New delivery methods promise to make these therapies more amenable to affected patients. Finally, the long-term effects of gastric plication on GERD symptoms do not appear to be especially promising, and further refinements in this technology are needed before it will become a viable alternative therapy for GERD.
*The US Food and Drug Administration has not approved this medication for this use.
Saludos Cordiales
Dr. José Manuel Ferrer Guerra