Rosuvastatin can regress the atherosclerosis
"Although statins rank among the most extensively studied therapies in contemporary medicine, the optimal target levels for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remain controversial," write Steven E. Nissen, MD, From Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio, and colleagues From the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Coronary Atheroma Burden (ASTEROID) Investigators. "Prior intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) trials have demonstrated slowing or halting of atherosclerosis progression with statin therapy but have not shown convincing evidence of regression using percent atheroma volume (PAV), the most rigorous IVUS measure of disease progression and regression."
To determine whether very intensive statin therapy could regress coronary atherosclerosis measured by IVUS imaging, the ASTEROID Study was performed at 53 community and tertiary Care centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. A motorized IVUS pullback was used to evaluate, in a blinded fashion, coronary atheroma burden at baseline and after 24 months of treatment. Of 507 patients who had a baseline IVUS examination and received at least 1 dose of Study Drug between November 2002 and October 2003, 349 patients had evaluable serial IVUS examinations after 24 months. All patients received intensive statin therapy with rosuvastatin, 40 mg/day. Two prespecified, primary outcome measures for efficacy were change in PAV and change in nominal atheroma volume in the 10-mm subsegment with the greatest disease severity at baseline. A secondary prespecified efficacy outcome was change in normalized total atheroma volume for the entire artery.
Mean baseline LDL-C level decreased From 130.4 ± 34.3 mg/dL at baseline to 60.8 ± 20.0 mg/dL (mean reduction, 53.2%; P <.001). Mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level increased From 43.1 ± 11.1 to 49.0 ± 12.6 mg/dL (mean increase, 14.7%; P < .001).
For the entire vessel, the mean change in PAV was -0.98% ± 3.15% (median, -0.79%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -1.21% to -0.53%; P < .001 vs baseline). Mean change in atheroma volume in the most diseased 10-mm subsegment was -6.1 ± 10.1 mm3 (median, -5.6 mm3; 97.5% CI, -6.8 to -4.0 mm3; P < .001 vs baseline). Median reduction in total atheroma volume was 6.8% (mean reduction, -14.7 ± 25.7 mm3; median, -12.5 mm3; 95% CI, -15.1 to -10.5 mm3; P < .001 vs baseline). Adverse events were infrequent and similar to those reported in other statin trials.
"Very high-intensity statin therapy using rosuvastatin 40 mg/d achieved an average LDL-C of 60.8 mg/dL and increased HDL-C by 14.7%, resulting in significant regression of atherosclerosis for all 3 prespecified IVUS measures of disease burden," the authors write. "Treatment to LDL-C levels below currently accepted guidelines, when accompanied by significant HDL-C increases, can regress atherosclerosis in coronary disease patients. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of the observed changes on Clinical outcome."
Study limitations include lack of a control group receiving either placebo or a less active statin; withdrawal of 22 patients for ischemic events creating a potential Source of bias; and inability to determine the degree to which regression documented by IVUS will translate into a reduction in morbidity and mortality.
AstraZeneca, the maker of rosuvastatin, funded this Study. Several authors have disclosed relevant financial relationships with AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, diaDexus, GeneLogic, GlaxoSmithKline, Integrated Therapeutics, Kos, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Schering-Plough, Bayer, and/or Reliant.
In an accompanying editorial, Roger S. Blumenthal, MD, and Navin K. Kapur, MD, From The Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Preventive Cardiology Center in Baltimore, Md, note various Study limitations.
"Unfortunately, the ASTEROID Study does not provide definitive Information regarding the relationship of LDL-C lowering and extent of coronary atherosclerosis regression to determine if high-intensity treatment is required to achieve regression," Drs. Blumenthal and Kapur write. "While IVUS-documented atherosclerotic regression is an intriguing finding, clinicians must remember that this may not be the best measure of the treatment's effect on hard cardiovascular end points.... The results of several ongoing trials will help determine what agent or combination of pharmacologic agents is most efficacious in the long-term management of at-risk patients."
Dr. Blumenthal has disclosed receiving Clinical Research support and honoraria From speakers' bureau activities From Pfizer, Merck, Schering Plough, AstraZeneca, KOS, and Sanofi during the past 12 months. Dr. Kapur has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
JAMA. 2006 Posted online March 13, 2006.
Learning Objectives for This Educational Activity
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
List benefits of intensive vs moderate lipid-lowering therapy among patients with coronary atherosclerosis.
Identify the effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atheroma volume.
Clinical Context
The REVERSAL (Reversal of Atherosclerosis With Aggressive Lipid-Lowering) trial demonstrated that intensive therapy with statins could improve outcomes compared with moderate statin therapy among patients at high risk for coronary heart disease. This research, published in the March 3, 2004, issue of JAMA, compared 40 mg of pravastatin (moderate therapy) with 80 mg of atorvastatin (intensive therapy) and followed up patients for lipid levels as well as C-reactive protein levels and coronary atheroma volume.
LDL-C levels decreased to a greater degree with intensive therapy compared with moderate therapy, and the mean reduction in C-reactive protein levels was 5.2% with pravastatin therapy and 36.4% among subjects receiving atorvastatin. While coronary atheroma volume increased by an average of 2.7% among subjects receiving pravastatin, atheroma volume was stable for the 18-month treatment period among participants in the atorvastatin group.
Rosuvastatin is the most powerful statin in terms of LDL-C reduction. The authors of the current study examine the effects of rosuvastatin on lipid values and coronary atheroma volume.
Study Highlights
Patients eligible for study participation were adults undergoing coronary angiography for a clinical indication, such as chest pain or follow-up of an abnormal cardiac stress test. All subjects had at least 1 coronary obstruction between 20% and 50% in luminal diameter and had not received statins for at least 4 weeks prior to study enrollment. Patients with previous angioplasty in the target vessel, triglyceride levels higher than 500 mg/dL, or poorly controlled diabetes were excluded from study participation.
All study participants received 40 mg of rosuvastatin daily. The authors deemed it ethically unacceptable to include a control group receiving no therapy or low-intensity statin therapy.
The treatment period was 24 months. The main study outcome was coronary atheroma volume as measured by IVUS. The imaging sequence (baseline vs 24 months) was concealed from clinicians who read the study in an attempt to reduce possible observer bias. The authors also followed lipid levels.
1183 patients were screened for study participation, and 507 subjects were included at 53 centers. 349 participants had follow-up IVUS data available at 24 months. 22 subjects withdrew due to ischemic events. Baseline characteristics between study completers and noncompleters were similar.
The mean LDL-C level on treatment was 60.8 mg/dL, a 53.2% reduction from the mean baseline value. The mean high-density lipoprotein level on treatment was 49 mg/dL, a 14.7% increase from baseline.
The mean decrease in PAV was -0.98%, a significant decrease from baseline.
In the 10-mm subsegment of artery with the greatest degree of severity, rosuvastatin therapy was associated with a 9.1% decrease in atheroma volume.
The total reduction in atheroma volume was 6.8% after the treatment period. 63.6% of subjects demonstrated regression of PAV following rosuvastatin therapy.
There was no significant difference in the study's main findings after examining subgroups based on baseline demographic or lipid factors.
The authors performed analyses in which the 158 study noncompleters experienced no regression of atheroma volume, and rosuvastatin's positive results remained statistically significant. This outcome was also again found true in an analysis in which the 22 subjects with ischemic events were evaluated as having atheroma progression.
Adverse events were fairly rare, with 1.8% of the study population experiencing liver enzyme levels more than 3 times above normal. Creatine kinase levels rose more than 5 times above normal in 1.2% of subjects. 3.7% of participants discontinued rosuvastatin because of musculoskeletal complaints.
Pearls for Practice
The REVERSAL trial demonstrated that high-dose atorvastatin was superior to moderate-dose pravastatin in reducing LDL-C and C-reactive protein levels. While subjects receiving pravastatin had some progression of coronary atheroma volume, atorvastatin was associated with stable coronary atheroma volumes.
In the current study, 40 mg of rosuvastatin daily was associated with a reduction in PAV, atheroma volume in the portion of artery with the most severe disease, and total atheroma volume. Most subjects experienced regression of atheroma volume with rosuvastatin.
Saludos Cordiales
Dr. José Manuel Ferrer Guerra
